Group B Blog Post
In Gilead, I found the author's style of writing to be especially interesting. The writing was not especially structured, as it lacked some standard writing conventions. First, the author does not follow standard grammar for dialogue. Instead, it is written out, stating what is said as its own sentence. This adds a sense of realism to the book. It makes it feel like the book was really written as a letter, and not as a book with the intention of publication. The second characteristic of Gilead that adds realism is the lack of chapters. Chapters would make it seem as if the book was planned out in advance, something uncharacteristic of a letter. By simply writing freely, Robinson makes Gilead feel authentic.
I agree with your post. The fact that the Gilead does not have chapters makes it very different than other books. Not only does it feel very un structured, but like you said, the book doesn't feel as broken up. From your point of view, do you think this style of writing makes it more enjoyable to read and easier to follow?
ReplyDelete